"第三次修改稿又被打回来，审稿人说‘逻辑不清’——我在UBC图书馆熬了三个通宵，差点以为要延毕……"
? 别硬刚！学会‘翻译’加拿大审稿人的潜台词
加拿大教授审稿超爱用委婉表达，比如：‘The argument needs strengthening’ 不是让你补两句话，而是说你核心论点站不住！我同学在McGill就踩过这坑——以为加个文献就行，结果第四次才懂：人家要的是重新搭理论框架。
- ‘Not fully convincing’ = 数据样本太小或分析浅（建议补访谈/扩大N值）
- ‘Could be clearer’ = 图表混乱或段落跳脱（温莎大学写作中心推荐用‘逻辑树’重构段落）
- ‘Further discussion is needed’ = 没关联到课程强调的‘社会公平视角’（尤其常见于多伦多大学社科类论文）
? 回复模板这样写，让导师都说‘Professional’
别再只写‘We have revised the paragraph’！我在滑铁卢合作项目中学到的高分模板：
Reviewer Comment:
The methodology section lacks detail on participant selection.
Response: We thank the reviewer for this observation. As per page 7, lines 12–15, we have now explicitly stated that participants were recruited through purposive sampling via community centers in Vancouver (n=30), with clear inclusion criteria added in Table 2.
Response: We thank the reviewer for this observation. As per page 7, lines 12–15, we have now explicitly stated that participants were recruited through purposive sampling via community centers in Vancouver (n=30), with clear inclusion criteria added in Table 2.
✅ 关键点：指明具体页码+行数+修改位置，附带调整图表编号
? 实战锦囊：利用加拿大高校免费学术资源
别自己硬扛！这些服务我亲测有效：
| 学校 | 服务内容 | 预约难度 |
|---|---|---|
| UBC 写作中心 | 一对一论文润色+逻辑诊断 | ⭐⭐⭐（提前3周约） |
| McMaster 学术支持办 | 提供审稿回复信范例库 | ⭐（随时可查） |
? 亲测有效总结：遇到‘Major Revision’先别慌，把每条意见拆成‘质疑点+修改动作+证据标注’三件套，成功率翻倍！
恭喜您，成功提交！
